The law firm of
Philipps & Philipps, Ltd. represents consumers who have been abused by illegal debt collection actions.
Use of this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Information available on this site is not, nor is it intended to be legal advice. If you have any questions about this site or about possible representation, please contact us.
Areas Served: Philipps and Philipps is a consumer individual and class action law firm. Our lawyers represent clients throughout Illinois and Indiana including, but not limited to Chicago, Elgin, Aurora, Schaumburg, Naperville, Palos Hills, Bolingbrook, Joliet, Plainfield, Barrington Hills, Waukegan, Winnetka, Evanston, DeKalb, Geneva, Batavia, Wheaton, Woodridge, Rockford, Harvey, Markham, Westchester, Cicero, Berwyn, Belvidere, West Chicago, Country Club Hills, Crestwood, Rolling Meadows, Romeoville, Chicago Heights, Tinley Park, Orland Park, Oak Forest, Homewood, Lansing, Calumet City, Hazel Crest, Dolton, Riverdale, Midlothian, Frankfurt, Oak Lawn, Oak Park, Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Will County, McHenry County, Lake County and more.
Address: 9760 S. Roberts Rd. Suite 1,
Palos Hills, Illinois 60465
At Philipps & Philipps, our focus is helping protect consumer rights. Our attorneys have been appointed class counsel in hundreds of class settlement proceedings, and over thirty contested class certification proceedings.
Additionally, our attorneys have litigated the following Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) cases in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:
- Owens v. LVNV Funding, 832 F.3d 726 (7th Cir. 2016);
- Bravo v. Midland Credit Management,
812 F. 3d 599 (7th Cir. 2016);
v. Global Credit & Collection Corporation, 679 F.3d 632 (7th Cir.
v. Integrity Financial Partners, 634 F.3d 416 (7th Cir. 2011);
DeKoven v. Plaza Associates, 599 F.3d 578, 582-583 (7th Cir.
- Evory v. RJM
Acquisitions Funding, 505 F.3d 769 (7th
v. RJM Acquisitions Funding, 480 F.3d 493 (7th Cir. 2007);
v. Collection Professionals, 455 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2006);
- Durkin v. Equifax Check Services,
406 F.3d 410 (7th Cir. 2005);
- Randolph v. IMBS, 368 F.3d 726
(7th Cir. 2004);
- Olson v. Risk Management
Alternatives, 366 F.3d 509 (7th Cir 2004);
- Taylor v. Cavalry, 364 F.3d 572
(7th Cir. 2004);
- Hyman v. Tate and Kirlin, 362
F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 2004);
- Chuway v. National Action Financial
Services, 362 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 2004);
v. Cadle Co., 333 F.3d 801 (7th Cir. 2003); and 441 F.3d 474 (7th Cir.
- Horkey v. J.V.D.B. & Associates,
333 F.3d 769 (7th Cir. 2003);
- Turner v. J.V.D.B. & Associates,
330 F.3d 991 (7th Cir.2003);
- Davis v. Hutchins, 321 F.3d 641
(7th Cir. 2003);
- Sanders v. Jackson, 209 F.3d
998 (7th Cir. 2000);
- Bailey v. Security Nat. Servicing,
154 F.3d 384 (7th Cir. 1998);
- Berman v. GC Services, 146 F.3d
482 (7th Cir. 1998);
- Jang v. A.M. Miller and Associates,
122 F.3d 480 (7th Cir. 1997);
- Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein &
Bright, 119 F.3d 477 (7th Cir.1997); and,
- Gammon v. GC Services, 27 F.3d
1254 (7th Cir. 1994).